Archive for January, 2006
I got a "party census document" the other day purporting to be asking my views on political issues. Naturally, it was really just a thinly-veiled request for donations. The fill-in-the-bubble form sought contributions in the gradations of $25, $50, $100, $250, $500, and Second Mortgage. I declined to make a donation in any of those amounts, my eye wandering down to the cop-out response of "Gee, I’d like to help, but…" Interestingly, selecting the cheapskate option pledges me to enclose $11 "to cover the cost of tabulating my survey". Eleven bucks? To run a bubble-form through a reading machine? Who the hell did they hire to tabulate these surveys? Halliburton?
The other day, though, I felt as though I’d been suddenly plunged into that nightmarish world of Scott Adams’ fevered imagination. I had a conversation that, even having had a few days to digest, still makes my head spin. It was easily the most maddening one I’ve had in months.
To be fair to my boss, this nonsense was decided elsewhere, somewhere higher up the food chain. A level, where, I am told, there are strange and terrible artifacts beyond our mortal comprehension like "offices with doors" and "windows"; these totems of power, it is said, are so potent as to render nigh infallible those who are entrusted with them. It’s like some sort of psychological version of Clarke’s Third Law: the thought processes of those with sufficiently advanced careers are indistinguishable from illogic. We of humbler station, who could not possibly hope to perceive the Greater Purpose, must simply hear and obey.
Anyway, what I found most incredulous, was this pinhead "analyst" that NPR dredged up to comment on Disney’s acquisition of Pixar. Why this piece of garbage got stuck in my craw when there are more important issues at hand, I can’t tell you, but it did. This dumb son of a bitch lauded the purchase, calling it good for both parties, but especially for Pixar. There was nothing remarkable about this statement, but it was quickly followed by his See, the way this big genius figured it, Pixar was "subsisting on one movie a year" [emphasis mine], and that the miserable lumpen proletariat at Pixar was no longer trapped in their dead-end Pixar jobs; they would now have opportunities to explore other career paths within the larger company. Right. Those poor folks at Pixar, barely making ends meet, locked into crappy jobs at a moribund animation studio. I happen to know a few things for sure about the animation business: one is that Disney basically churned out one major feature a year, too, but they have a massive marketing and media empire to cover for all their flops, which were flops because they lacked what really makes Pixar flicks great: superior writing, not the technology (though that, of course, is most impressive as well). Two, the people I’ve met that are in animation generally love their work, and are often willing to starve now and again just to keep on doing it. What really gets me going is that ol’ Einstein, some senior business analyst with Simpleton, Harumph, & Dross (or whatever his firm was called) is most likely "earning" a six-figure salary for spewing nonsense like this out of his ass. I guess I should have majored in Pontification instead of studying Political Science, foreign language, and Information Technology.
The other day one of my irascible colleagues and I were commiserating about what a pain in the ass some of the DATs are. Many, if not most of them, were written in the Bad Old Days when our division was a completely independent company (long before they were purchased by Apple), when the development model would have been handily summed up as either "a couple of guys dicking around with source code" or "let’s add every feature suggested by every user". Dealing with legacy code is never much fun, especially if the jokers who wrote it didn’t bother to, oh, say, write anything down. So anyway. We were talking about these DATs, and one of us (I don’t remember who) mumbled the name of one causing problems, to which the other responded, "What? Which code?". At just that moment, a third colleague, in response to some different but equally irritating problem, exclaimed "Fuck!", and thus was born the "fuck" DAT. So, without further ado, here is ^(*fuck). It’s funnier if you understand PowerSchool, but it’s still worth a cheap laugh even if you don’t. Or maybe it isn’t. Ah, who gives a
I hope you enjoyed this little lesson. This handy information will also be sent to our customer base in the general release notes for the next version of our application.
So, anyway, great fun, Google bots are crawling my site; whatever. What really piqued my interest was that I got three unique hits from Apple- as in the mothership. A wave of paranoia suddenly washed over my ape’s brain. I mean, sure, I work for them, but tucked away in an independent software division about 146 miles away from the Sacred Core. I’d be willing to bet that more than 99% of the residents of the main campus have no idea our specialist software division even exists. I only know one person who works within the warrens of the Infinite Loop, and I’m pretty sure we never discussed this blog, ever. So what shadowy cabal is pinging me from Cupertino? I got even more paranoid.
The day came and went, though, and neither the HR staff nor a gang of logo-wearing toughs showed up to work me over and kick me out the door, so I figure I’m probably safe. Still, the whole episode gave me enough of an adrenaline kick to finish a bunch of stuff I’ve been meaning to finish for a week or so. I guess mental instability can produce positive results every once in a while.
I sent those two pages to the color printer, and walked down the corridor to retrieve them, happily contemplating the weekend of indolent bliss that was finally within my grasp. All I needed was to grab the proof and—what was this? A blinking error light? Ah, I saw the printer was out of paper. I found and fed the machine another half ream, but this was not a sufficient remedy. The error light continued to blink angrily at me. This time, the display told me that the output tray was full. I picked up the hefty sheaf of printed pages, and it resumed printing. And printing. And printing. And printing. Obviously, somebody else had sent a job to the printer before I did. I groaned with dismay as the machine ground out page after page, with no signs of stopping. Curious to know whether or not any color toner would be left for my job, I flipped through the papers I held in my hand, and let out another groan. I was holding over 200 pages of a black-and-white document, and there was no end in sight; the printer was still churning out pages of the stuff. What the hell? Who sends 250+ page grayscale jobs to a color printer? Please, for the love of all that is holy, what could possibly have prompted you to send that document to that particular printer?
In case you are not aware of it, let me acquaint you with the fact that there is an enormous, fast grayscale printer about thirty feet away from the color printer. It holds an staggering amount of paper. It collates, prints double-sided, and scrambles eggs in the shell, yet you chose to send your grayscale document to the slow color printer, holding me in abject thrall to your sadistic choice of output devices. I do not know who you are, but let me inform you that you, sir or madam, made an enemy on Friday. I am so furious that when I discover your indentity, I will most likely send a hostile glare in the general direction of your desk from the safety of my cubicle, and that’s just the appetizer before the main course of pain I will be serving you. The next time you need a multiple-page document from me, I will give it to you without staples or paper clips, and I will print it on the printer farthest away from your cubicle, then ask you to go fetch it. I will use the Hobo Bold font instead of Myriad Set. I will print it in landscape instead of portrait. You, my friend, have no idea what you’ve gotten yourself into. I will make you beg for death, or at least for a cup of coffee. Oh yes. Vengeance will be mine. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||